Wargaming could stop giving community contributors the ships before they’re released, but then WG loses the advertising and feedback mechanisms, community contributors lose their revenue, and players don’t get the info they want. My solution to this? Well I don’t really have one. The ship is released more powerful than it was originally intended to be.

If the players like the changes to the ship, the ship gets released. Community contributors release an update to their reviews. The Ship’s release is delayed to make the changes.Ħ.

To avoid taking a financial hit, they buff the ship whether it needed it or not. Oftentimes focusing on the bad or go batshit crazy about an *actual* or *perceived* weakness.ĥ. Community contributors share their opinions. This includes strengths and weaknesses of each ship.ģb. Community contributors tell the public everything about the ship. Ship reviews released by community contributors YT or on the blogs.ģa. I just seem to be either terrible with it or just very unlucky, from the 10-12 games I played I have an winrate of around 35 My HE shells seem to bounce, alot. Beutifull ship, fast, maneuverable, good cruiser torp range. Although typical demand respect for your own and spit on the Italians. Hi there, So I recently got the duca daosta. To actively and gleefully ignore this is saddening. Aosta, Abruzzi, Diaz, Cardona, Montecuccoli, Garibaldi, etc. All these ships are known by proper names and not titles. New ships is given to supertesters and community contributors for testing/reviewing.ģ. No Im just asking for same treatment as other branches. Players get excited and want to know more.Ģ. Every new premium ship or ship branch that is released follows a disturbingly familiar pattern:ġ. You can’t blame WG for these buffs to premium ships.

World of warships duca d'aosta review